Example District Council Reg 18 Draft Local Plan

Support

Representation ID: 5091

Received: 28/01/2025

Respondent: Nerdy Novels Publishing

Agent: Ms Chloe Martinez

This representation warns against the potential ineffectiveness of policies without enforcement mechanisms and calls for strong guidelines to ensure sustainable practices in development.

Support

Representation ID: 5112

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Nerdy Novels Publishing

Agent: Ms Chloe Martinez

Concerns raised about the proposal's focus on previously developed land over green spaces. Emphasises the need for a balanced approach to sustainable development that includes public amenities and recreational areas. Calls for a reassessment of land allocation to ensure community needs are met.

Thank you for the support, in particularly around revitalising old sites.

Support

Representation ID: 5119

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Nerdy Novels Publishing

Agent: Mr Oliver Thompson

Raises concerns over the implications of concentrating on previously developed land, risking infrastructure strain. Calls for a thoughtful land-use strategy that prioritises community needs and future sustainability.

Support

Representation ID: 5145

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Nerdy Novels Publishing

Agent: Mrs Linda Garcia

The plan to build 14,020 dwellings threatens overstressed local facilities, while the 20% buffer invites excessive development. Local residents may face negative impacts as developers benefit. More comprehensive assessments are needed to ensure balanced housing growth.

Your response and support for the policy is noted.

Support

Representation ID: 5155

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Nerdy Novels Publishing

Agent: Ms Olivia Jones

The proposed heavy allocation towards Town 1 raises serious issues of oversaturation, risking the needs of smaller towns and skewed demographics. The reliance on windfall sites adds further uncertainty, necessitating a revision for balanced development across Example District.

may require a reduction in the number of houses

Support

Representation ID: 5175

Received: 10/02/2025

Respondent: Nerdy Novels Publishing

Agent: Ms Chloe Martinez

The proposal lacks context regarding the rationale for the suggested bedroom mix, potentially neglecting the future housing requirements of growing families and ignoring the importance of community consultation.

Support

Representation ID: 5184

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Nerdy Novels Publishing

Agent: Mrs. Patricia Davis

The representation criticises the proposal for prioritising specialist housing over affordable family homes. Concerns are raised about the disconnect between market demands and economic realities.

Noted

Support

Representation ID: 5201

Received: 27/01/2025

Respondent: Nerdy Novels Publishing

Agent: Ms Chloe Martinez

Insisting on self-build plots raises uncertainty around ownership and permissions, leading to potential community conflict. A clearer, more realistic approach to land acquisition and processes is required.

Support

Representation ID: 5217

Received: 12/02/2025

Respondent: Nerdy Novels Publishing

Agent: Ms Chloe Martinez

The objection raises concerns about increasing pitches to 40 without proper assessment of socio-economic impacts, especially on schools. Emphasis is placed on community cohesion, calling for a re-evaluation of the pitch recommendations for the wellbeing of all.

Support

Representation ID: 5231

Received: 02/02/2025

Respondent: Nerdy Novels Publishing

Agent: Mr Oliver Smith

This objection raises concerns over the insufficient justification for additional plots and the socioeconomic impacts on existing residents, urging dialogue to ensure inclusivity in decision-making. The proposal, as it stands, risks causing division within the community.