Example District Council Reg 18 Draft Local Plan
Search representations
Results for Nerdy Novels Publishing search
New searchSupport
Example District Council Reg 18 Draft Local Plan
Specialist Housing Provision
Representation ID: 5175
Received: 10/02/2025
Respondent: Nerdy Novels Publishing
Agent: Ms Chloe Martinez
The proposal lacks context regarding the rationale for the suggested bedroom mix, potentially neglecting the future housing requirements of growing families and ignoring the importance of community consultation.
Support
Example District Council Reg 18 Draft Local Plan
H3: Meeting All Housing Needs
Representation ID: 5184
Received: 09/02/2025
Respondent: Nerdy Novels Publishing
Agent: Mrs. Patricia Davis
The representation criticises the proposal for prioritising specialist housing over affordable family homes. Concerns are raised about the disconnect between market demands and economic realities.
Support
Example District Council Reg 18 Draft Local Plan
Self and Custom Build
Representation ID: 5201
Received: 27/01/2025
Respondent: Nerdy Novels Publishing
Agent: Ms Chloe Martinez
Insisting on self-build plots raises uncertainty around ownership and permissions, leading to potential community conflict. A clearer, more realistic approach to land acquisition and processes is required.
Support
Example District Council Reg 18 Draft Local Plan
Gypsies and Travellers
Representation ID: 5217
Received: 12/02/2025
Respondent: Nerdy Novels Publishing
Agent: Ms Chloe Martinez
The objection raises concerns about increasing pitches to 40 without proper assessment of socio-economic impacts, especially on schools. Emphasis is placed on community cohesion, calling for a re-evaluation of the pitch recommendations for the wellbeing of all.
Support
Example District Council Reg 18 Draft Local Plan
H6: Travelling Showpeople
Representation ID: 5231
Received: 02/02/2025
Respondent: Nerdy Novels Publishing
Agent: Mr Oliver Smith
This objection raises concerns over the insufficient justification for additional plots and the socioeconomic impacts on existing residents, urging dialogue to ensure inclusivity in decision-making. The proposal, as it stands, risks causing division within the community.